Comments on: Nuclear Homesteading http://libertariananarchy.com/2009/01/nuclear-homesteading/ Government is immoral, unnecessary, and doesn't work! Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:46:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: David Z http://libertariananarchy.com/2009/01/nuclear-homesteading/comment-page-1/#comment-67 David Z Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:23:45 +0000 http://libertariananarchy.com/?p=181#comment-67 @ freefarmgeek: I'd tend to agree. But the chances for finding a sufficient tract of terrestrial land for pursuing such hobbies is essentially nil. If you want to pursue your dream of nuking the moon, who am I to stop you? @ MW: I was considering the same problem(OK, not about nukes, but generally about homesteading and pollutants) for the topic of a blog post a few months ago, I think I deleted it because I couldn't pull it all together. This is good stuff, maybe I'll reprise mine... @ freefarmgeek: I’d tend to agree. But the chances for finding a sufficient tract of terrestrial land for pursuing such hobbies is essentially nil. If you want to pursue your dream of nuking the moon, who am I to stop you?

@ MW: I was considering the same problem(OK, not about nukes, but generally about homesteading and pollutants) for the topic of a blog post a few months ago, I think I deleted it because I couldn’t pull it all together.

This is good stuff, maybe I’ll reprise mine…

]]> By: freefarmgeek http://libertariananarchy.com/2009/01/nuclear-homesteading/comment-page-1/#comment-66 freefarmgeek Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:55:39 +0000 http://libertariananarchy.com/?p=181#comment-66 I don't think nuclear homesteading should be rejected.  If I truly owned enough land that the fallout from such a hobby wouldn't aggress against others, than I certainly have a right to do so.  Now if someone desired to purchase or rent a tract of that land, it is assumed that the prior owner has a prescription to contintue to radiate that tract with his nuclear activities.  As I understand what you are saying above, the nuclear nut would only be liable should he increase his nuclear activities.  You'd have to be a desperate or a fool to want this guy as a neighbor.  :) I don’t think nuclear homesteading should be rejected.  If I truly owned enough land that the fallout from such a hobby wouldn’t aggress against others, than I certainly have a right to do so.  Now if someone desired to purchase or rent a tract of that land, it is assumed that the prior owner has a prescription to contintue to radiate that tract with his nuclear activities.  As I understand what you are saying above, the nuclear nut would only be liable should he increase his nuclear activities. 

You’d have to be a desperate or a fool to want this guy as a neighbor.  :)

]]>