Comments on: Anti-intellectual Intellectualism http://libertariananarchy.com/2008/12/anti-intellectual-intellectualism/ Government is immoral, unnecessary, and doesn't work! Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:58:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: maja http://libertariananarchy.com/2008/12/anti-intellectual-intellectualism/comment-page-1/#comment-3068 maja Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:23:45 +0000 http://libertariananarchy.com/?p=115#comment-3068 Hello Although i agree that the state is immoral and doesnt work does that mean that we do not need laws and police as law enforcement force neither? thank you Hello

Although i agree that the state is immoral and doesnt work does that mean that we do not need laws and police as law enforcement force neither?

thank you

]]> By: Toban Wiebe http://libertariananarchy.com/2008/12/anti-intellectual-intellectualism/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Toban Wiebe Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:53:50 +0000 http://libertariananarchy.com/?p=115#comment-9 @Curt, regarding 2), I just added an about/contact page, just click on the author name. @Curt, regarding 2), I just added an about/contact page, just click on the author name.

]]> By: Curt Doolittle http://libertariananarchy.com/2008/12/anti-intellectual-intellectualism/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Curt Doolittle Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:30:05 +0000 http://libertariananarchy.com/?p=115#comment-8 Michael, 1) Added your site to my blogroll 2) Be good if there was a 'contact me' link somewhere (if there is I can't find it), and something about you as an individual. 3) I agree with Hans/Rothbard in principle, but first, once the state gives succor to so many at the expense of others, it is no longer a moral argument for them. b) most people prefer a practical benefit rather than moral argument, since moral arguments are made possible by relative prosperity. c) we need more work on a process of conversion and d) only religions, not rational networks, have succeeded in converting sufficient numbers of a population. e) even if the people wthin a group can be converted to some philosophical mythos, then those external to it become the problem, because, at least, from analysis so far, such a group would be weaker. So what we need is something far more radical. It's not that we're radical. It's that we're not yet radical enough. Curt Michael,

1) Added your site to my blogroll
2) Be good if there was a ‘contact me’ link somewhere (if there is I can’t find it), and something about you as an individual.
3) I agree with Hans/Rothbard in principle, but first, once the state gives succor to so many at the expense of others, it is no longer a moral argument for them. b) most people prefer a practical benefit rather than moral argument, since moral arguments are made possible by relative prosperity. c) we need more work on a process of conversion and d) only religions, not rational networks, have succeeded in converting sufficient numbers of a population. e) even if the people wthin a group can be converted to some philosophical mythos, then those external to it become the problem, because, at least, from analysis so far, such a group would be weaker.

So what we need is something far more radical.

It’s not that we’re radical. It’s that we’re not yet radical enough.

Curt

]]>